V. Overview of Person-Centeredness within NWD

A core purpose of the NWD effort is have a system that is more person-centered.  Hilopa‘a (www.hilopaa.org), a non-profit agency that is a one-stop for information and referral, technical assistance and training, has been providing person-centered training to Doors statewide.

This section provides a brief overview of what it means to be person-centered.  To be person-centered, all interactions with an agency, including intake, assessment, and support planning, should reflect the participant’s preferences and goals.  Exhibit 5 compares the traditional approach for providing social services with a person-centered approach.

Exhibit 5: Comparing of Traditional and Person-centered Planning

Traditional
Person-centered Approach
Who leads the development of plan?
Case manager leads a “team” in the development of a plan.  The team is defined by the case manager and provider or may be specified in administrative regulation.
The participant leads the planning meeting.  The role of the case manager is to assist and facilitate development of the participant’s plan.  The team includes people selected by the participant.
Where and when does planning meeting occur?
A meeting usually occurs in a location selected by the provider or case manager during regular “business” hours.
Planning meeting is at a location and time that is convenient to the participant.
What does the planning group discuss?
Team focuses attention on what is important for the participant based on assessments of functional needs, behavior, social skills, and medical needs.
Planning focuses on the future desired by the participant. It will involve a balance of what is “important to” the participant for a happy life, as well as what is “important for” the participant to remain healthy and safe.  Information gathered from the participant about interests and preferences is balanced with information gathered from the more formalized assessment.
What does the plan contain?
The participant’s plan may look like the plans and ideas written for other people. Traditional plans frequently reflect what others think the participant should do. Service options and categories will define goals and goals may reflect what can occur within existing programs without changing anything.
Plans will reflect interests, qualities, and preferences that are unique to the participant and reflect the participant’s relationships and community.  Some ideas may appear to be “out of reach” and can require major changes in how support is provided.
How is the plan evaluated for effectiveness?
The case manager and the team determine how effective the plan has been and whether outcomes have been achieved.
The participant evaluates how well the plan has worked and helps shape changes that improve outcomes and goals.

When working with participants in a person-centered system, staff should focus on the participant’s goals and preferences. The participant’s personal goals can be whatever is important to him/her, such as getting a job, spending more time with his/her family, or moving to a new home.  While there may not be a service for every goal, a person-centered approach should result in a better fit between what a participant wants and the services that she or he receives, including identifying supports offered by other Doors.